Whiskybase uses tracking cookies in order to improve the website. Do you allow Whiskybase to place these cookies?

You can always change your decision under the privacy settings of your account.

Regardless of your choice Whiskybase places functional cookies to store settings and account information.

Whiskybase

Caol Ila 1982 CA

Overall rating
90.90/100
votes
31
Category
Single Malt
Distillery
Bottler
Cadenhead (CA)
Bottling serie
Small Batch
Vintage
1982
Bottled
2016
Stated Age
34 years old
Casktype
Bourbon Hogshead
Number of bottles
150
Strength
50.4 % Vol.
Size
700 ml
Bottled for
Bresser & Timmer
Market
nl Netherlands
Added on
05 Aug 2016 12:24 pm by Bachess
UncoloredNon-chillfilteredCask StrengthSingle Cask Whisky

Average value

€ 302,73

31 × member ratings

Level Username Rating
Member Senior oklima
96
Member Senior Pasupata
96
Expert Senior Drk Neknul
93
Connoisseur adrenalin
92
Expert Senior ak47
92
Newbie Wass1878
92
Expert Junior glasbak70
92
Expert Senior WFarchive
92
Expert Senior checkpointrk
92
Expert Junior uludde
92
Connoisseur ctu
91
Member Senior Reakwoon
91
Connoisseur hs305
91
Super Administrator Ras Mazunga
91
Connoisseur ARDBERG
91
Expert Senior Raremalt61
91
Connoisseur Hvdree
91
Expert Senior Malten
90
Member Senior Usl1978
90
Expert Senior ducksingel
90
Connoisseur MaltMartin
90
Expert Junior Liquid_Gold
90
Expert Junior Mickeman
90
Expert Senior Foreman
90
Expert Senior RareMalt
90
Specialist Isonone
90
Member Senior Old Ardbeg
90
Expert Senior HarryB
89
Member Senior Cortadope
89
Expert Senior Beccis
88
Expert Senior Bjarne H
88

38 × in collection

Level Username Collection
Member Senior 400mike
2
  • closed
  • closed
Expert Senior ak47
1
  • closed
Expert Junior alanwake
1
  • closed
Member Junior Bill
1
  • closed
Expert Junior breflex
2
  • closed
  • closed
Member Senior Cédric M
1
  • closed
Super Administrator danilo
1
  • closed
Expert Junior detachedblue
1
  • open
Member Senior GiorgosUK
1
  • closed
Connoisseur hs305
1
  • empty
Member Senior ileach1
1
  • closed
Expert Junior inchmurray
1
  • closed
Specialist Isonone
1
  • closed
Member Junior jderks
1
  • closed
Member Senior jobert
1
  • closed
Member Senior Kaioukun
1
  • closed
Member Senior Localoca
2
  • closed
  • closed
Member Senior mcgallus
1
  • closed
Member Senior Pasupata
1
  • sample
Member Senior Raoul Duke
1
  • closed
Expert Junior Schwark
1
  • closed
Expert Junior sharky-san
1
  • closed
Expert Junior Suevia
1
  • closed
Expert Junior uludde
2
  • closed
  • closed
Newbie Wale
1
  • closed
Member Senior Whiskyking
1
  • closed
Hidden user
1
  • closed
Hidden user
1
  • empty
Hidden user
1
  • open
Hidden user
1
  • closed
Hidden user
1
  • closed
Hidden user
1
  • closed
Hidden user
1
  • sample
Hidden user
1
  • closed

Average 4 x 25 rates

Nose
1
Taste
1
Finish
1
Balance
1
Category Rating
Nose
23
Taste
23
Finish
23
Balance
22

Tastingtags

5 Notes

hs305
Connoisseur hs305 Review note
20 Mar 2017 9:49 pm
hs305 gave this whisky 91 points

[March, 2017]  Let us see who did the better old Caol Ila bottling (from 1982, 34 years old) - the Belgians (The Nectar, 51,1 %, BE) https://www.whiskybase.com/whisky/88384/caol-ila-1982-ca  or the Dutch (Bresser&Timmer, 50,4%, NL). 

Colour:  The NL is a shade darker than the BE, but not really significant.

Nose:  Both have this adorable, very complex and creamy aromas profile that is so typical for 30+ years Caol Ila from that time.  The NL is a little smokier and offers more sea notes while the BE has some fruity aromas (apples) in addition.  Water is not needed.  On the nose I vote a draw, both are simply great.

Arrival:  The BE has a remarkable big arrival on the tongue, mouth-coating and oily.  The NL is fat and oily too, but not as sticky as the BE.  So this round goes clearly to Belgium.

Body:  Both creamy (toffee), complex and very balanced with a light, old-style smokiness.  The NL has some flavours that remind me of salted popcorn or honeycomb while the BE offers tropical fruits, spices (black pepper, salt) and a hint of dark chocolate.  Both are very delicious with a slight advantage for the Dutch this time.

Finish:  Remarkably long on both sides.  The NL is nicely creamy here while the BE offers more vanilla and wooden notes.  Another slight advantage for the Dutch again..

With water the NL gets much smoother while the BE shows a little more oakiness, but I like the more sharp profile better when both are neat.  All in all this is a draw, so both the Belgians and the Dutch did a marvellous job when selecting their cask.  Well done!

Weighted Rate
91.4
Nose
93
Initial taste
90
Body
93
Finish
92
Price
88
Presentation
90
There is no accounting for taste...
ctu
Connoisseur ctu Tasting note
23 Jun 2018 9:10 am
ctu gave this whisky 91 points
Color
Amontillad
Nose

Maritime minerals, peat and smoke. Honey and fruits. Citruses.

Taste

Powerful and oily. Pepper, peat and smoke. Sea minerals and citruses. Buttery popcorn.

Finish

Long, peaty, oaky, spicy.

Comments

Compared to the belgian single cask, this is less woody and fruity, but more dirty and it has a longer finish.

Hvdree
Connoisseur Hvdree Review note
31 May 2018 11:49 pm
Hvdree gave this whisky 91 points
Weighted Rate
90.6
Nose
92
Initial taste
90
Body
92
Finish
91
Price
88
Presentation
88
Nomnomnomnomnomnom...
Old Ardbeg
Member Senior Old Ardbeg Tasting note
27 Nov 2017 3:53 am
Old Ardbeg gave this whisky 90 points
Color
Pale gold
Nose

quite oily and maritime at first. the peat has been subdued by age/maturity. fish oil. still some peat but it's melted into the background.


wH20 some green notes show.

Taste

matches the nose quite well in that it's very oily and maritime in the attack as well. then, some smoke, some ink, some olive notes then the briney tarry ropes you hope for from a good old peated malt. still has some oomph to it.  great depth.


water brings out a little more sweetness.

Finish

not incredibly long (medium length) but very clean and satisfying, mellowed peat and slight brine. 


Finish gets a little longer with water.

Comments

Delicious whisky but the form, particularly the finish, won't let me put it above 90.However it has a nose I rarely find in modern malts. Much oilier and brinier than modern whisky. Reminds me of a 79 conn choice Ardbeg. Probably should have come out of the cask a year or two earlier, but its still great. 90pts


Did this head to head against Cadenhead Small Batch 31 yr 52.1%

There are only two kinds of whisky. Good whisky, and that other kind. My Collection My Market
PierreFunck
Member Senior PierreFunck Note
22 Jul 2017 1:01 pm

Whiskyfun: 92 points

http://www.whiskyfun.com/#220717

Whiskybase

Whiskybase is founded in 2007 with the goal to create the biggest resource of whisky information in the world. A community driven website built by and for whisky enthusiasts.  




Whiskybase B.V. 
Zwaanshals 530 
3035 KS Rotterdam 
The Netherlands 

KVK: 60207205
VAT: NL853809112B01

Copyright © 2018


Forgot your password?

Login