Whiskybase uses tracking cookies in order to improve the website. Do you allow Whiskybase to place these cookies?

You can always change your decision under the privacy settings of your account.

Regardless of your choice Whiskybase places functional cookies to store settings and account information.

Whiskybase

Turv Exloo Prime

Overall rating
63.87/100
votes
25
Category
Spirit
Distillery
Bottler
Distillery Bottling
Bottling serie
Single Cask 2016
Vintage
2016
Bottled
2016
Casktype
Virgin Oak Cask
Strength
43.0 % Vol.
Size
500 ml
Added on
20 Jul 2016 8:53 am by recursiewhisky
UncoloredNon-chillfilteredSingle Cask Whisky

Average value

€ 23,84

one in wishlist

25 × member ratings

79 × in collection

Whisky Reviews for Turv Exloo Prime

10 users have left a review for this whisky and scored it an average of 63.87 points

  1. markjedi1 scored this whisky 35 points Connoisseur

    Disgusting
    The Turv Distillery was founded in Exloo, Holland, in 2015. Matthieu Smakman invested 1.8 million euro and makes, according to him, different distillates through a very innovative and unique process. He created gin, Geneva, rum, vodka and whisky. Well, not exactly whisky, for the Turv Exloo Prime Whisky Single Cask 2016 is actually a spirit that matured for only 3 months. That is why he had to remove the word whisky from his label from the authorities. Smakman went on national television to comment on what he felt was a deplorable demand. He furthermore stated that the industry clearly sees him as a threat because he succeeded in making whisky in three months’ time that is equally good or even better (again his words, not mine!) than his Scotch counterparts that do mature for the required 3 years. What a bold statement. I had no other choice that to try it.
    The nose is very rough on grain, spirit, glue and resin. It even reminds me a bit of unwashed sports socks and… cooked ham gone sour. Immature and without any depth whatsoever. This is very unpleasant, in fact.
    But it becomes even worse on the palate! In comparison, the nose was okay-ish, so to speak. Again resin and some grain, a hint of lime, but apart from that all rough and spirit. You would be forgiven for calling this undrinkable. In all honesty, this is simply disgusting.
    The finish is mercifully short on glue and sugar.
    Yikes! Smakman suffers from delusions of grandeur if he thinks this is any good. It is not. Nor is it whisky. It is without exaggeration one of the worst spirits I have ever tried. Hence I was not surprised when I learned on the 6th of March that the distillery was put on the market, albeit for 3 million euro.UPDATE 02/04/2017
    I have long debated whether or not to publish this, for in the night of 30 March, the Turv Exloo Distillery was hit by disaster. The distillery burnt to the ground and the fire brigade found that it was in fact arson. The body of the 53 year old owner was found in the rubble the day after. A desperate act? This is not something you wish upon anyone. I wish the family a lot of strength in these trying times.

  2. whiskyd scored this whisky 55 points Expert Senior

    • Nose
      55 55
    • Taste
      58 58
    • Finish
      52 52

  3. JacobaEd scored this whisky 77 points Connoisseur

    • Nose
      81 81
    • Taste
      74 74
    • Finish
      74 74

  4. jhut scored this whisky 77 points Expert Junior

    Weapon of scotland Hooghalen, 30-07-2017
    • Nose
      Fruity, strong smell. Start very sharp, quickly become rounder. Later he becomes more and more pleasant. Fresh fruit, pear. Looks a bit like a lowlander, quite a bit of body for such a young whiskey. Yet there is an unpleasant sharpness in the background that I do not like, somewhat vinegar-like. Do not get hold of it yet. No trace of peat. Nice amount of grain
    • Taste
      Nice round, pleasant. Beautiful development, soft.
    • Finish
      Nice sweet, bourbon influences. Misses somewhat development and complexity. Blood little bit dead. Let me think of a kind of blend. Think it is 2nd or 3rd refill. Totally not smoky, by the way, we can not recognize any form of peat or smoke. Taste also unfortunately did not develop later, should have had more time on the barrel. Wood influence is also low. Despite that he tastes surprisingly mature, lacking the sharpness that is present on the nose. Unfortunately.

  5. St. Pauli scored this whisky 54 points Connoisseur

    Please note that if you see a photo on which the word "whisky" is mentioned, this is an old picture. TURV has been commanded by the Dutch competent authorities to remove the word whisky from its label. 

  6. Oogadal scored this whisky 37 points Expert Senior

    This pretty undrinkable spirit shouldn't be on Whiskybase. The nose is the less worst part, I would go one step further than Thijs100 and would advise any whisky enthusiasts to skip this one. So no first dram at all. Some people say you have try everything in life. They are wrong.
    • Nose
      60 60
    • Taste
      32 32
    • Finish
      30 30

  7. thijs100 scored this whisky 56 points Connoisseur

    I know it's a spirit, but the producer clearly wants it to be judged as a whisky. Whichever way you judge this, I have a hard time believing any whisky enthusiast will pour himself a second dram.
    • Nose
      A tad sour-ish (pickled lemon peel). Not unpleasant, but different. Grainy and flowery. No depth or layers.
    • Taste
      Glue, which is a common aroma (in whisky), but not necessarily a common flavour. Some strange off-notes. It is off-putting. Slightly phenolic. Grassy. White pepper.
    • Finish
      Really short. A hint of oak, spices. But the off-notes also make an encore. Luckily not for too long.

  8. St. Pauli scored this whisky 54 points Connoisseur

    It's not a whisky to start with, despite the fact that it was marketed in this way. It comes closer to a grain than to a single malt. The exact ingredients are kept secret by the staff, even during tours.
    Anyhow, this is a rather characterless spirit, without a signature feature. Of course we can wait until it can be officially called "whisky", but I suspect it needs much longer time to make this spirit enjoyable.
    • Nose
      Old gold for a 3 month old spirit? That's remarkable. The nose is rather on grain spirit: glue, sweat socks. It's raw and unpolished. This changes quickly, but to a very neutral and characterless spirit. There may actually be peat in there, yet it's masked by a dominant smell of alcohol (this baby was distilled to almost 95%  ABV...). This alcoholic smell lingers, along with some grainy notes and vanilla essence. It smells rather spirity and artificial. 
    • Taste
      Glue, maize, pine sap, sugar, vanilla, but still this alcoholic feel. Comes across as a grain whisky. This can be due to the distillation method to ca. 94% ABV.
    • Finish
      Glue and sugar continue in the finish, with some pepper. 

  9. iromby scored this whisky 82 points Member Senior

    Tasting notes after I first opened the bottle.

    Nose:

    The nose is familiar. It reminds me of the artisan distillers of the USA. Pungent, drying. "Bourbon like" in the sense that single malt drams from the USA matured in American White Oak smell simular, but not equal.
    Some oak,
    Some vanilla,
    The main nose is obvious spices, mainly clove,
    Light banana,
    Slight melon,
    Orange,
    Slight leather,
    Oddly enough a hint of young cheese,
    After a while some mint,
    The nose of something Solventy is gone after you let it breath for a while before nosing it.

    Palette:
    Soft,
    Creamy,
    Nice clear alcohol,
    warming,
    I feel it going down in my body, which I like.

    I'm having some trouble spotting the main taste. That is mainly because I think the main tastes will be strait from the malt. But since I have not tasted mash, I would not really know.
    I am pleasantly surprised by the total effect of this young spirit. My advice would be is to let it breath for a bit to get rid of the "spiritus" nose, which quickly goes away. The wood influence is clearly mainly spice. The vanilla sweetness is there, but only more maturation time will give it more of the vanillin. There is lightly fruitiness, mainly banana and slight orange.

    What I learn from this is that active wood is a main driver is adding flavour to a dram. This was not unknown to me, but this is the first three months maturated dram I tasted. I plan to go to the distillery and hopefully I can take some new make with me. Just to compare flavour notes.

  10. Amsterdam scored this whisky 40 points Specialist

    The Turv Exloo Prime Whiskey Single Cask 2016 is a 3 month old distillery from the Turv distillery in Exloo.

Tastingtags

Add tasting tags by clicking the flavours you recognized in this whisky.

Whiskybase

Whiskybase is founded in 2007 with the goal to create the biggest resource of whisky information in the world. A community driven website built by and for whisky enthusiasts.  




Whiskybase B.V. 
Zwaanshals 530 
3035 KS Rotterdam 
The Netherlands 

KVK: 52072819
VAT: NL850288836B01

Copyright © 2018


Forgot your password?

Login