Whiskybase
Overall rating
89.23/100
votes
190
Category
Single Malt
Distillery
Bottler
Distillery Bottling
Bottled
11.08.2020
Stated Age
21 years old
Casktype
30% Bourbon, 30% Rum, 25% Sherry + 15% Port
Number of bottles
3300
Strength
46.0 % Vol.
Size
700 ml
Bottle code
20/68
Barcode
610854000202
Added on
13 Sep 2020 8:26 pm by nallacam
UncoloredNon-chillfiltered

Average value

£ 439.99

75 × in wishlist

190 × member ratings

346 × in collection

Whisky Reviews for Springbank 21-year-old

35 users have left a review for this whisky and scored it an average of 89.23 points

  1. chrismo scored this whisky 90 points Expert Junior

    Springbank 21 from 2020. The price has hardly changed compared to previous years. Unfortunately, the (wholesale) dealers play their own game and charge absurd prices!
    UK price = £ 190!
    Price in DE = 219 €!

    Unfortunately hardly available for the price. I opened a bottle myself today and from the first impression I find it very tasty! But I would not pay the prices above 260 €!

  2. Macallan1968 scored this whisky 91 points Expert Senior

    The Springbank 21 with 30% bourbon, 30% rum, 25% sherry and 15% port is exceptional, but good!

    You need time with this dram, otherwise the many aromas that you get into the glass cannot develop.

    For me a very successful experiment by Springbank. You will be enchanted by an incredible variety of flavors that make you want more after every sip.

  3. didi1893 scored this whisky 91 points Connoisseur

    Even if the different types of casks dominate in my opinion, the typically dirty and lemony springbank character is present and wonderfully integrated for me. The selection and marriage of the different barrel types gives this bottling varied and multi-layered moments of pleasure. Tastes and I like it very much!

    23/22/23/23 (91P)
    • Nose
      Deep dark rust with an orange shimmer emanates from the Premium Snifter, tough and oily "legs" adhere to the glass wall. Dark fruit sweetness rises heavily with a hint of caramelized sugar, oily a minimal smoky note dissolves and mixes with a handful of dry, earthy peat. Dark, velvety vineyard peach plays with old apricots and candied strawberries, sugar and hard caramel end in engine oil and tire abrasion, at the same time I am put down by extremely long and thick "legs" which pull their endless paths back into the glass. A pinch of salt trickles onto juicy lemon wedges, raspberries and blackberries flash, maritime echoes emerge and disappear in the same instant. The nose is extremely changeable and aromatic, I could smell this wonderful nose forever. The saliva begins to flow slowly, I'm looking forward to the first sip!
    • Taste
      The first sip wets the tongue dirty, sour fruit aromas suddenly "contract" the mouth, a blink of an eye later sweet peach pieces and liquid caramel stick to the palate, a few grains of salt melt on the tongue, roasted hazelnut fragments end in dark and slightly smoky wood tones. Dark chocolate crumbles on leather, liquorice and a few drops of espresso finish with a load of white pepper on the tip of the tongue and on the palate. Oily, dark, greasy and earthy, plus an intense mix of citrus fruits and sweet stone fruits ... Apricots, lemons, grapefruit, raspberries and blackberries, dried orange, raisins and currants, the variety of fruit aromas is impressive. Eucalyptus and mint, leather and creamy hazelnuts swim in the saliva slowly from the citrus aromas.
    • Finish
      The aftertaste gradually announces itself slightly bitter. Oily earth and dark fruit are still sticking to the palate, nuts are increasingly appearing. Creamy walnuts, almond slivers and roasted hazelnuts, accompanied by leather and dried tobacco, just fantastic!

  4. WhiskyCasual scored this whisky 91 points Expert Senior

    In my opinion, a successful marriage of the different barrel types. Even if port and sherry dominate in my first impression, you will find an enormous number of flavors - especially in the nose - that coexist and that change over time.
    • Nose
      91 91
      Sweet and fruity, sour, with blackberries and nuts, wine gum and salty liquorice. Changes again and again over time and also the distance between the nose and the glass;)
    • Taste
      90 90
      Oily, a strong start with pepper, a little sweet, but then leather, earthy aromas, dark chocolate, a little caramel and salt quickly dominate
    • Finish
      91 91
      long, becoming significantly more bitter with orange jam, musty cellar, pepper, salt and dark red fruits

  5. cfosterk scored this whisky 88 points Expert Senior

    tasted from a dram at the commercial in campbeltown - very viscous and quite cloying initially. felt congested with quite alot going on. Not sure the cask selections worked or perhaps all very active and fighting for attention on first contact. I remember oranges and lashings of dark chocolate along with lots of raisins and dates. The sherry exerted. After an hour and a half the nose was superb. I think spending time with a bottle (despite the cadenheads price of £176) will be fun and the initial score is likely to increase

  6. hs305 scored this whisky 88 points Connoisseur

    [October, 2020] What a "Frankenstein concoction" as a friend puts it - so the question is: Was this an intentional mix or did they have to balance out some too aggressive maturations as it happens often with port or rum casks? I am not afraid to buy a bottle because this release looks very interesting to explore, at least...

    ...and at last! Clearly, some of the casks matured way too aggressively and added a lot of bitter-astringent tannic notes - wood-heads might enjoy these but I prefer balanced malts over liquid woods. But the most fascinating encounter was a bold and impressive nose that vanished almost completely within five minutes of breathing, very strange. All in all an interesting dram to have from time to time but I do not ask for a second one in a row, usually.
    • Nose
      89 89
      The colour is very dark at brown sherry and the nose offers a bold profile, as expected (I use a big spherical blender's glass for nosing, only). The most dominating impressions are the sherry aromas together with some substantial wooden notes while the rum is very shy and I do not get any malt- or port-induced aromas at all. This profile changes significantly upon breathing - the power of the first impressions vanishes quickly as do the sherry-induced aromas but the others do not occupy the space provided now. Instead, this nose somewhat collapses to a shy and rather unimpressive profile after about five minutes of oxidation - I had the first score at 91+points and now it is 88-points, unfortunately. Still it is fine and somewhat complex but it takes both time and trained olfactory cells to get the aromas now. This is one of the fastest "vanishing noses" I ever experienced, so hurry to enjoy the first sniffs right after serving...
    • Taste
      89 89
      The taste is quite complex as can be expected from such a mix but the bitter wooden notes drive it out of balance, according to my taste buds (only). Heavy wood-heads might enjoy this but lovers of balanced drams should shy away unless they deliberately want to experience such wood-driven maturations. It is interesting to explore but the drinking enjoyment is somewhat limited (to me) - sometimes it tastes great but then all of a sudden the extreme tannins kill the enjoyment (again and again). As with most of these heavy wood-driven releases forget about adding water - it flattens the nice flavours further but strengthens the anyway too aggressive wooden notes.
    • Finish
      85 85
      The dram arrives a little hot on the palate which turns quickly into a satisfying warmth but the coating effect is limited. Instead a significant drying-astringent feeling takes place from heavy tannins, obviously (as could be expected given the bold wooden notes in the nose). To me this is distracting, clearly. The finish is of medium length and keeps these drying-astringent moments until the very end. Coming back to my initial question: Yes, some of the rum and/or port casks matured too aggressively as to be released separately without some soothing sherry and bourbon casks added. So it is a "Frankenstein concoction", indeed!

  7. nallacam scored this whisky 91 points Connoisseur

    Tried in the 1920s Blenders glass.

    Incredibly exciting change from nose to mouth.
    If the nose still has a lot of fruit and freshness to offer, the rather heavy and earthy aromas come into play in the mouth.
    No sharpness at any point.

    For me another fantastic 21-man springbank.
    • Nose
      92 92
      With 46% it is possible to take a full nose and smell the intense, dark fruit aromas. Sweet wood provides the framework for kisch, espresso and chocolate.
      With more oxygen, strawberries and marzipan, sour cherries, rose hips and red fruit tea are added.
      In the background there are strong oak tones, damp ship planks, leather and brine.
      Spices also slowly come to the fore, allspice, clove and star anise. There are also associations with cognac and rum.

      A nose that is wonderfully complex and in this case definitely benefits from the 46%.
    • Taste
      92 92
      Fresh and intense oak at the same time. Coffee notes, dark chocolate. The fruit takes a back seat.
      Apricot and ripe peaches mix with chocolate.
      Green walnut, espresso beans, Darjeeling, dried shitake mushrooms, prunes.
    • Finish
      89 89
      Dry, long, dominated by the oak barrel.
      No bitterness, very dry.

  8. jjkmlss scored this whisky 70 points Expert Junior

    THIS IS TRASH

  9. gallfux did not rate this whisky Expert Senior

    Comparison between Springbank 21yo (2015) WID: 64003, Springbank 21yo (2019) WID: 127557 and Springbank 21yo (2020) WID: 165480

    Different in color.

    It's like that in the nose too. The 2015 is quite mineral, musty and somehow green. In addition, more yellow fruits, partly also citrus fruits. The Springbank notes are still there, but of course a bit more degraded than with more recent bottlings. The oak still looks relatively fresh. Also some wet leaves.

    The 2019, on the other hand, has rather red, relatively sweet berry fruits with some residual acid. Sometimes the fruits also look like caramelized. The mineral ones are rather subtle here. The Springbank notes shimmer in the background. Then add some chocolate.

    The 2020 is now even darker. More like plum jam. In addition, not yet completely dried tobacco leaves. Aromatic dark oak tones. One can only guess at the Springbank notes. But there is a certain filth.

    In the mouth of the 2015, the oak is more in command, which also brings a noticeable flavor. Such a mixture of dry and fresh wood. But at first there is only a little sweetness and the yellow fruits. Then Springbank comes through. In the end something like cold smoke and musty wood.

    With the 2019 it is a nice interplay between fruit, sweetness, spice and tart notes. After a certain time, the fruit, which is astonishingly lighter in the mouth than in the nose, and the sweetness less and the spicy and tart notes prevail. Not really bitter, but rather dry. A pleasant acidity and the slightly dirty notes are also in play.

    For me, the 2020 will not taste as balanced as the 2019. Nice sweetness and fruit at first. Then the wood effect looks a bit rough and not so elegant. For me quite blunt and uncouth. In addition, salty liquorice, dark chocolate, tobacco and wood seasoning. In the finish something of the Springbank character.

    So for me the 2015er is clearly the weakest of the three. I also just poured a small sip of 12 CS and diluted it with water. Even that looks fuller than the 2015 21er.

    Then comes the 2020. It's kind of delicious. The nose is really good. In the mouth, however, it seems a bit too clumsy and unpolished, as the oak comes across relatively quickly and leaves little space for other things.

    The 2019 is the most homogeneous whisky for me. Of course, it also got a lot of casualties, but that doesn't impose too much and leaves room for other things. So he is also the winner of this comparison.

  10. GIngi scored this whisky 89 points Expert Senior

    Yeah, the color is cool! Everyone is already going crazy, chasing the whisky and the prices are skyrocketing! But the content is what counts, not the margin!
    And the content is too much. A nice attempt but simply too much of a good thing. The whisky looks a bit unbalanced and has no clear edge. Not typical for Springbank, but an attempt that is worth a maximum of 89 points for me and only after a lot of time and air!
    • Nose
      89 89
    • Taste
      90 90
    • Finish
      89 89

Tastingtags

Add tasting tags by clicking the flavours you recognized in this whisky.

Whiskybase

Whiskybase is founded in 2007 with the goal to create the biggest resource of whisky information in the world. A community driven website built by and for whisky enthusiasts.  




Whiskybase B.V. 
Zwaanshals 530 
3035 KS Rotterdam 
The Netherlands 

KVK: 52072819
VAT: NL850288836B01

Copyright © 2021


Forgot your password?

Login