Both eyes have the same color. The aromas are generally close, the difference in nuances. In the vintage of 2015, it is perceived as somewhat more alcoholic and fresher at the same time with light plant notes, as well as less sweet (less honey and caramel), the fruits are more like lollipops. But all these differences are so ephemeral! The body is about the same density, subjectively slightly more burnt caramel and astringency in taste, slightly peppery notes, although sweetness, malt and butteriness are approximately at the same level. The aftertaste is very close, except that in this release it is a little tougher. After several sipes, the differences between the two samples are almost completely erased, which is understandable.
Conclusions. I think some discrepancies are related to the difference in the average aging periods of alcohols in each of the blends. The vintage of 2014 was bottled in November 2018 and it is obvious that the age of the spirits in the blend could not be less than 3 years and 10 months. And at maximum, he could be 4 years and 10 months. In contrast to this situation, the 2015 release was released in January 2019, i.e. here the ratio of minimum and maximum by age of alcohols has completely different limits: [3 years 1 month and 4 years]. We don’t know which barrels specifically went for these vintages, but since 15-25 barrels are selected for each blend, it is quite natural to assume that in the first case the proportion of more mature spirits could be higher due to their larger specific gravity. However, in fairness, it should be noted that without comparison "head-on" to distinguish two vintage from each other is very difficult. Therefore, they have the same ratings - 80/81.