Whiskybase

Glenfarclas 105

Overall rating
88.75/100
votes
115
Category
Single Malt
Distillery
Bottler
Distillery Bottling
Bottled
2018
Stated Age
22 years old
Casktype
Sherry Casks
Number of bottles
3600
Strength
60.0 % Vol.
Size
700 ml
Label
Celebrating 50 Years of 105
Barcode
5018066180050
Added on
08 Jul 2018 12:34 pm by ctu
UncoloredNon-chillfilteredCask Strength

Average value

€ 250,32

43 × in wishlist

115 × member ratings

335 × in collection

Whisky Reviews for Glenfarclas 105

16 users have left a review for this whisky and scored it an average of 88.75 points

  1. Prof_Dr_John scored this whisky 90 points Expert Senior

    Fruity, sweet, pure sherry and "bar strength" with 60% promises a lot. The Glenfarclas 105 22 Years is a successful malt. For lovers of Glenfarclas certainly worth a try. He is surprisingly "fresh" for his age. And that is also my point of criticism: for 22 years I would have expected much more wood influence and spicy aromas on tap. Here is the 105er a bit weak on the chest. He offers was more complexity than the "normal" 105s with its about 10 years, but you might expect more after 22 years. Nevertheless, he gets from me 90 points, because many things just fit: age, sherry, cask strength, color, visual presentation etc ... Whether the good is worth 150-160 euros, everyone must decide for themselves. Anyway, you get a lot of whisky for the money and if you're a fan of cask strength, you will not get past this bottling. Collector anyway not :)
    • Nose
      Initially behave a bit. The whisky needs some time in the glass. After about 10 minutes, the sherry aromas are becoming increasingly noticeable. Dark fruits, pickled raisins, Christmas cakes, prunes are accompanied by an astonishing freshness, probably due to the 60%. With a little water, he opens up: there are significantly more notes like ginger, nuts and a little lather. The alcohol does not sting your nose.
    • Taste
      The 60% push neatly. It tingles on the tongue, but the Glenfarclas is milder than expected. Distinct sherry aromas dominate at first, after some time the described dark fruits emerge stronger. The whisky is surprisingly "fresh" for its age. After a few moments, a bit of bitterness is felt, which you can expect after 22 years. Delicate hints of liquorice tapping, the Sherry sweet says "hello" again. Very round, very pleasing.
    • Finish
      Medium to long. The whisky is still very present in the mouth. If you run your tongue along the cheeks, you get the full load of sweetness again. Slowly, the palate becomes drier and it leaves a very balanced sensation in the mouth.

  2. hs305 scored this whisky 89 points Connoisseur

    [September, 2018] Oops, a straggler to my great Glenfarclas tasting challenge - but better late than missed (a german saying)...

    ...and it was worth to include this dram into the challenge. It is a subtle modern style sherried dram with no "I punch that flavours in ya face" attitude like so many other modern "designed" releases. A honest whisky, but too expensive in my opinion - as a drinker I am willing to pay around 100 Euro for a bottle of that quality (taking the 105 proof into consideration already, so 75 Euro for a standard proof one)...

    [June, 2019] I re-tasted this dram tonight and it seems it improved due to oxydation in an almost empty bottle. The nose is much more impressive (I score it 89 points tonight) and both taste and finish are very quaffable. Tonight I like it best when reduced to about 45% abv (just stop when the dram turns cloudy) because an additional delicious chocolatey note is released at this strength.
    • Nose
      88 88
      The colour is tawny and the nose is rather shy which is no surprise at 105 proof (60% abv). After some breathing it offers a fine modern sherry profile without any whiff of sulphur - thank you for that, George! And by the way: It would be very respectful to your customers if you could mark your sulphurous releases with an appropriate statement on the label (as is done with peated stuff from usually unpeated distilleries). After a reduction with a fair share of water the nose opens up but still it is not a very bold impression. It stays rather shy with a fine subtleness.
    • Taste
      90 90
      The taste is nicely layered on a balanced combo of sherry-induced and malt-driven flavours with some delicious chocolatey notes. I find all the usual suspects for such a profile like raisins, plums, figs, nuts, orange peel, herbs, spices (nutmeg and more) and and and... No flaw that I can detect and all in perfect harmony. Some water releases significant more flavours and turns both the mouthfeel and finish smoother, hence easier to drink (surely, when starting with 60% abv). I like it both neat and reduced to about 48% abv.
    • Finish
      89 89
      The neat dram arrives (as expected) hot and peppery in the mouth but it instantly coats it with a warming feeling and no distracting moments. A nice mouthfeel for an overproof dram! The finish is of medium length and vanishes more on the spicy side what is delicious (peppers, chilis, a hint of salt). No drying or astringent moments, the woods are just about right in here.

  3. didi1893 scored this whisky 89 points Connoisseur

    Hallelujah, what a grenade! An incredibly intense and (for me) dirty sherry bottling in which I feel the musty and musty sulfur note partially borderline. As I know, I am "allergic" to sulfur, although it is just so outrageous here. Otherwise, a 105er piglet needs no further words, especially not if it is a 22 year old bottling. A great, intense and characterful malt with rough edges and a wonderful fresh menthol note. I like it very much!

    23/22/22/22 (89P)
    • Nose
      Strong amber rests in the Premium Snifter, on the glass wall long and oily "legs" pull their tracks, but optically this tasting starts to my taste. ;-) When first nosing the high alcohol content says "Hello" once, but after a few moments it works very harmoniously integrated and not disturbing at all. Immediately I notice a subtle and restrained sulfur note, this hides relatively quickly behind dark peaches and creamy caramel. Overripe plums and plums roll into ground hazelnuts, tough toffee hides a bit behind roasted and dark fruit flavors, a touch of menthol freshness dissolves and gives the otherwise dark and heavy nose a refreshing note. A slightly musty and musty base note is repeatedly doused by dried oranges and dark caramel, creamy dark chocolate leaves in conjunction with dark forest honey a sweet character. Dried plums and raisins rise, slowly the musty, musty side regains the upper hand. The variety of flavors is increasing, as is the interplay of flavors. Slowly but surely my salivation is stimulated.
    • Taste
      Powerful show the 60% alcohol content on the tip of the tongue. Again slightly musty and musty tones come to bear, as well as the dark fruit flavors in the form of dried orange slices and raisins or plums. Another small undiluted sip ... tart oak notes stick to the tongue before black pepper and wooden sharpness from the palate lay down over the tongue. Again, muff and mildew, as well as a not disturbing sulfur note. Slowly, the voluminous alcohol note ends, leaving behind dark, dark chocolate and spicy oak tones on the palate. Although I usually do not add water, I allow the 105s a few drops of water. The Glenfarclas becomes noticeably creamier and gentler, although unfortunately for me the musty sulfur note has intensified. Roasted walnuts and hazelnuts end in dark caramel and dark chocolate with a hint of herbal notes, a fresh, menthol-like freshness appears powerful after a few moments, while tart oak tones stand out. I think a water addition was not necessary, but it was worth a try.
    • Finish
      A subtle basic acuity is in the air, the Mentolische freshness pulls through the palate and gives the recurring Muff and Modernote a pleasant fresh basic note. Dark chocolate, espresso and spicy oak notes stick to the palate, dried raisins and oranges envelop the tongue in conjunction with subtle sharpness. Powerful and warming, despite the addition of water, the intense and sometimes tart aromas rest for a perceived eternity on the palate. Slowly a wonderful leather note and old tasty walnuts show up. Gorgeous!

  4. Conside scored this whisky 88 points Expert Junior

  5. dramspotter scored this whisky 84 points Expert Senior

    Blind tasting.
    • Nose
      83 83
      some polish; hard to come to life, esters, cream soda, pretty spirity
    • Taste
      85 85
      rich fruit
    • Finish
      85 85
      medium; quite balanced with some grape and not too many tannins

  6. Christian Wagner scored this whisky 91 points Expert Senior

    • Nose
      90 90
    • Taste
      91 91
    • Finish
      91 91

  7. Christian Wagner scored this whisky 91 points Expert Senior

    • Nose
      90 90
    • Taste
      89 89
    • Finish
      88 88

  8. Erik1908 scored this whisky 89 points Expert Junior

    Bought a 100 ml as part of a bottle share with my friends. Today I am going to taste the 22y H2H with the standard Glenfarclas 105.

    To summarize:
    In the nose I believe there is not too much difference.

    In the taste, the difference is much bigger. Standard 105 is much more alcoholic; industrial; more severe and harsh.

    I hope Glenfarclas will release more of these aged stated bottles in the future.
    • Nose
      I left both drams in the glass for approximately 10-15 minutes without tasting. The standard 105 always had a great nose. The 22y is a bit softer though. Nice and of course full of sherry. Sweet; fruity. Simply great.
    • Taste
      22Y: Wow. great first zip. Very stinging on the tongue. This does need some water. But not too much, in order to not spoil things. (Standard 105 for me always needed many drops of water).

      Water takes away part of the stinging. But not all, which I like. Sherry influences (of course); bit of pepper; oily; layered and well balanced.
    • Finish
      Dry, long and nice finish.

  9. Dris scored this whisky 89 points Connoisseur

    • Nose
      88 88
    • Taste
      89 89
    • Finish
      89 89

  10. Tom na Gruagaich scored this whisky 90 points Connoisseur

    Yes, a nice whisky, which is not sherry beating, strong fresh with beautiful oak, but also not too much. It is possible to say that the normal 105 is not worse either.
    • Nose
      Amazing fruity, fresh, even pear, peach, yet neat sherry, oak, tobacco and vanilla. Not sherry beating, very harmonious, despite the 60%
    • Taste
      In the mouth neat inflammation, a beautiful sherry sweet lighter toffee without stickiness and the oak pushes neat. The alcohol, but that's no wonder, but still goes great.
    • Finish
      Very tart, dark chocolate, oak, with dried fruits, but a little vanilla and a little light. Towards the end some tobacco and bitter oak.

Tastingtags

Add tasting tags by clicking the flavours you recognized in this whisky.

Whiskybase

Whiskybase is founded in 2007 with the goal to create the biggest resource of whisky information in the world. A community driven website built by and for whisky enthusiasts.  




Whiskybase B.V. 
Zwaanshals 530 
3035 KS Rotterdam 
The Netherlands 

KVK: 52072819
VAT: NL850288836B01

Copyright © 2018


Forgot your password?

Login