How can the same member have 2 x 100 rates recorded in the average for the same bottle? This affects the average score, I thought if you rated the primary bottle and then a derivative bottle this would not show?
Really people? This is better than Dalmore 21? In a massive impression? THIS???
It just feels like Macallan fans should be kick out of WB, no kidding. If you feel objective to give any Macallan a 87, there will be idiots who rate this 97 to make the total 92. So I'm rating this 10, in purpose. Just let you know this is a 87.
This is one of the all time classics. I have had a bottle of this every year since 1997. Over the years it has changed slightly, but always a quality dram. My only complaint as of late is the lower quality sherry caskings than even 8 years ago. Almost like there is more refill than first fill. This scotch deserves to be priced at about $150. $200 or more and you might as well move up to Rare cask which is a much better dram.
Wonderful fruits. Hard to beat Mac 18 nose.
Buttery smooth. Fruits.
medium and would be better if it was bottled at 46%