- Whiskybase ID
- Single Malt
- Distillery Bottling
- Bottling serie
- Dumpy Bottle
- Stated Age
- 12 years old
- 40.0 % Vol.
- 700 ml
- Short Black Band Type Label & Narrow Sunset on Tube
- Bottle code
- Added on
- 21 Aug 2009 1:52 pm
8 × in wishlist
106 × member ratings
330 × in collection
Whisky Reviews for Highland Park 12-year-old
15 users have left a review for this whisky and scored it an average of 84.50 points
Soft and harmonious, without a lot of spice, just a little salt and a little heather. Sherry, honey, vanilla, softened grain, cereals and discreetly fine leather - very soft and unfortunately without pep!
Here too, it is soft, watery and only has a little spice to start with. Honey, caramel, heather, dull sherry and freshly built up - but not very exciting.
In short - now becoming herbaceous and spicy! Combined with cereals, grains, honey, caramel and dry leather. Subtle notes of chocolate and milk appear in the background.
A bit disappointing even for a 40% version!
N: 85P / G: 86P / F: 87P
????: dark gold
????: warm cooker, sweet, bourbon, moderately intense and hang gliding, low power feel
????: slightly sweet, slightly chocolatey, unfortunately this 40% makes it a bit bland, a bit too flat, disappears quickly, nothing develops here
????: short and flat, slightly sweet
If this whisky was not 40% Or at least 46%, it would be something. And so, unfortunately, a medium-sized dog ... Nothing attracts attention, and because it is short and weak, it quickly disappears from the palate and memory ...
????: 3.5 / 10
- Colour: Full Gold
Nose: neat: very fresh at first nosing, followed by honey sweetness, some candy sweetness, some smoke and earth notes. with water: water takes the slight alcohol edge that shows (despite being "only" 40%). It also brings the sweetness a little more to the front.
Taste: neat: excellent balance of sweetness, malt, smoke (more on the mouth than on the nose), spices. with water: no real changes.
Finish: mouth coating, oily, sweet and smoke are the longer lasting flavours. Excellent! only minus is that it is a short-ish finish. with water: as with the taste, remains pretty much unchanged.
Comments: The late Michael Jackson used to call this the greatest all-rounder in the world! Just like the modern 18 year old, it really has a little of everything: sherry sweetness, smokiness, earth overtones, spice notes. All in great balance. Only minus note is the slightly short finish, it could do with 43% like the 80s bottlings, but overall an excellent whisky (hugely expensive if you can find it for sale, but the modern Highland Park 12 is a great whisky for a good price).
MY SCORE: Highly Recommended +
- Round, full, balanced. But somehow a bit boring towards the end
- Light-bodied. Almost a bit watery at times, so this one probably would have benefited much from a higher ABV (something it shares with the current bottlings). All in all, an interesting and tasty contrast to the current bottlings.
Tasted blind as the 17th whisky of my 2016 whisky advent calendar.
Woody and fruity malt with a bit of old mustiness going on, heather and boiled candy, vanilla, wood-spices infused with a soft and sweet note, citrus, smoke, some earthiness mixed with some nuttiness, some 'toasted' liquorice, somewhat coastal (sea etc?), just a little hint of honey, leather and some mushrooms (?). Classic, but not overly complex.
Cream, a faint coffee note, some zesty fruitiness, sea salt, smoke and tobacco, quite spicy, leather, some toffee, a light presence of treacle, some nuttiness, boiled candy and a little (pleasant) soapy note after a while.
Medium length - citrus, vanilla, cream, smoke, some fresh peat, liquorice, some old and 'assertive' wooden boards, some smoked almond extract, some dark treacle, a bit soapy and perfume-like at the very end (in a pleasant way actually).
- Note by Serge Valentin from whiskyfun.com:
Highland Park 12 yo (40%, OB, +/-1995) Colour: pale gold. Nose: there are similarities and there are differences. What’s sure is that this one’s rather more rounded and complex, with some extra-dimension around flowers and herbs, that were almost absent in the new one. Such as eucalyptus, or lemongrass. The honeyed side is also rather more complex, and there’s some beeswax as well, as well as rather more earth than in the new. Oh well, it’s simply more complex, and possibly older ‘on average’. Some parsley and chicken bouillon coming out after ten minutes, that should be the sherry talking. Mouth: yeah well, the differences are even more striking on the palate. Fatter, oilier, waxier, both more mineral and more earthy, with more cough syrup, more honeydew… Now it’s not tremendously better, but better it certainly is. Finish: quite long, earthy, grassy, with a mildly honeyed signature. Comments: I was afraid this one would have won by a landslide, but the new one hasn’t been put to shame. Now, should we have chosen an old ‘silkscreened’ 12 instead, the outcome might have been different. 5 points or more!SGP:562 - 87 points.
- N: Sweet-ish
C: It’s a straight shooter.
Scores a C