Overall rating
Single Malt
Signatory Vintage (SV)
Bottling serie
Cask Strength Collection
Stated Age
28 years old
Wine Treated Butt
Number of bottles
60.9 % Vol.
700 ml
Added on
02 Sep 2017 4:41 pm by JSW
UncoloredNon-chillfilteredCask StrengthSingle Cask Whisky

Average value

€ 345,00

22 × in wishlist

52 × member ratings

125 × in collection

Whisky Reviews for Blair Athol 1988 SV

6 users have left a review for this whisky and scored it an average of 90.26 points

  1. Макс scored this whisky 93 points Expert Senior

    • Nose
      94 94
    • Taste
      93 93
    • Finish
      92 92

  2. Segens scored this whisky 91 points Connoisseur

    Another excellent Blair Athol which has a perfect balance of cask & distillery character. Very very nice and a must have tried!
    • Nose
      The wine is decent in the back but it is present. Red fruits show up
    • Taste
      The red fruits play with honey sweetness. Alcohol super implemented. Great dram!
    • Finish
      Very nice long finish!

  3. Fassstärke scored this whisky 90 points Expert Junior

    • Nose
      91 91
    • Taste
      90 90
    • Finish
      89 89

  4. DenisLeonov scored this whisky 90 points Expert Senior

    Balance sheet (22) To my taste (90)
    • Nose
      Rotten fruits, strange brave notes, pastries (fresh) ... but the aroma is powerful, thick ... even sticky. Salt and honey, a baked apple and a scrap of dohlatina.Old spices, leather, wooden board. (23)
    • Taste
      Sweet-spicy.Fruits, wax, pepper (23)
    • Finish
      Finish sweet, compote of dried fruits and spices, cream and date. (22)

  5. Hvdree scored this whisky 89 points Connoisseur

    • Nose
      88 88
    • Taste
      89 89
    • Finish
      90 90

  6. Totoro scored this whisky 87 points Expert Senior

    Tasted in tandem with its twin (WB ID 97735).

    Same refill-y character as its sister bottling, but this one is a bit sweeter on the nose, and I can't detect any sulphur at all, which isn't necessarily a good thing in this context. Fruity and sweet: peaches and berries. More winey than its counterpart. Clearly perceptible, but subdued wood, nicely resiny. Very good nose, but not a total knockout, rather like a lighter, fruitier, well-sherried Glenfarclas.

    Like its sister cask, this, to my mind, needs water. Diluted, a highly welcome herbal element comes out along with the savory notes (beef stock, all kinds of umami) that I already found in the other bottling. I'm gonna say: parsley. Very nice; this really benefits from some water and some time to settle.

    Meaty, dark and robust on the tongue, with burnt caramel and thick gravy. I think this one is actually better on the palate: less rubbery, more herbal, a bit deeper and more complex. Finishes perhaps a tad more interesting than its twin due to the additional herbal aspect.

    Quality-wise, it's a toss-up: this one boasts the better palate, the other one is more interesting on the nose. Both are very good, substantial drinking whiskies, and not only for those who would like to know what this paxarette business was all about.


Add tasting tags by clicking the flavours you recognized in this whisky.


Whiskybase is founded in 2007 with the goal to create the biggest resource of whisky information in the world. A community driven website built by and for whisky enthusiasts.  

Whiskybase B.V. 
Zwaanshals 530 
3035 KS Rotterdam 
The Netherlands 

KVK: 52072819
VAT: NL850288836B01

Copyright © 2018

Forgot your password?